Re: Re: Can We Have Comments? —– a fictional blog post

responding to: https://farkascity.org/blog/re-can-we-have-comments

As a neutral apolitical party I have no opinion on this debate.

I have extreme opinions on this debate. Farkas city blog is full of blatant contradictions. I am offended that Farkas's mayor would have one.

Our honorable mayor says “My primary goal with FarkasCity is helping nontechnical people become digitally independent “. This runs opposed to the central notion of our mayor's post. The post is telling Farkas citizens why they can't have comments.

The basic point of the post is a clarification of why Farkas city lacks comments. The basic point of the post is an explanation of why our mayor will not add comments. The basic point of the comment is obscuration of our mayor's totalitarian habits. As my 80 something year old driving instructor Harold would say “basically 1984”. I think the masses would have preferred a simple yes, or no. The masses love education.

If the mayor wants us to be independent, would they then not allow us to have comments, even if this destroys our own independence.

Authoritarian Democracy is when the masses democratically elect a dictator who removes their rights. Farkas city is not independent, or authoritarian.

If I freely chose a lack of freedom. Am I making a free choice?

If someone forces me to be independent am I still independent?

Anyways. Remember Farkas city is a utopia with zero flaws. I love Farkas city and our mayor's recent comments!!! Independence is dependence, please report the ministry of commenting!!!